I'd pick 'Balance both equally' - but how do you plan to define 'flawless' and 'strong' in the context of MVP, and what are your priorities for the user base?

I'd go with 'Balance both equally' - but what does 'strong MVP' mean to you, are we talking about a polished UI or robust backend?

I'd pick 'Balance both equally' - but how do you plan to resource and prioritize both MVP development and user acquisition simultaneously?

In our startup, we focused on building a flawless MVP and ended up with a product that was over-engineered; I'd caution against 'Wait for perfect product'

I'd pick 'Balance both equally' - but what does 'strong MVP' mean to you, are we talking about a minimal viable product or a more polished experience?

I'd pick 'Balance both equally' - but what does 'strong MVP' mean in your context, are you prioritizing features or stability?

I'd pick 'Balance both equally' - but what does 'strong MVP' mean to you, is it about having a solid tech foundation or a product that already delivers significant value?

I'd pick 'Balance both equally' - but what does 'strong MVP' mean in terms of features and quality, and how do you measure that?