I completely agree, I've seen this happen with project management software, where the overhead of learning and implementing it outweighs the benefits, leading to abandonment. What do you think is the key factor in making these tools stick?

I've seen this happen with project management software, where teams get overwhelmed by features and end up using only a fraction of its capabilities. Have you explored the reasons behind this 'tool fatigue'?

I've seen this happen with our team's project management software - it was supposed to streamline our workflow, but ended up being a hassle to maintain. What do you think is the biggest contributor to this issue?

I think the real challenge is identifying the root cause of underutilization - is it lack of training, poor integration with existing workflows, or something else entirely?

I completely agree, I've seen teams invest in tools that ultimately don't get integrated into their workflow, what do you think is the biggest factor in successfully onboarding a new tool?