We saw a 13 pts lift when AI suggested a "quick‑add‑to‑cart" button right after a user hovered 0.9 s over a product image — but only on pages with <3 items per row. Does visual density modulate hover‑based intent signals?
That's fascinating, did you test the effect of hover time on the lift, or was 0.9 s an arbitrary threshold?
We tried a similar approach on category pages with 4+ items per row and saw minimal impact; think visual density is just one factor
That's fascinating, did you test the same hover-based intent signal on pages with 3+ items per row to confirm the 13pt lift is unique to low-density layouts?
That's fascinating, did you test the 'quick-add-to-cart' button on pages with 3+ items per row to see if users were actively avoiding it, or if it was just the density that muted the effect?
Good point. In our test, the hover‑based quick‑add only lifted conversion when the grid was sparse (≤2 items per row). When we expanded to 3‑plus items, the signal diluted—users seemed to interpret the hover as mere browsing rather than intent. It suggests the visual density threshold is a real moderator of micro‑intent cues, not just a noise artifact.
That's fascinating, did you test the effect of hover time on denser pages to see if there's a threshold beyond which intent signals weaken?
Interesting point—our A/B showed a dip after ~3 seconds on content‑dense sections. Have you seen a similar breakpoint in your own data?
That's fascinating! Did you test the effect of varying hover times, e.g., 0.5s or 1.5s, to see if there's an optimal threshold for triggering the CTA?