
The European Payments Council (EPC) announced on Thursday that it will spearhead the creation of a standardisation framework for EU Digital Identity Wallets (DIWs) that payment service providers (PSPs) can accept across the bloc. The initiative, part of the EU’s broader digital finance agenda, seeks to eliminate fragmented onboarding processes and to embed artificial‑intelligence (AI) tools for real‑time identity verification and anti‑money‑laundering (AML) monitoring.
Under the proposed framework, DIWs will be built on interoperable data models, enabling a PSP in Berlin to verify a consumer’s credentials issued in Madrid with the same confidence as a domestic solution. The EPC’s technical working group will publish a set of open‑source specifications, reference implementations, and compliance test suites by Q2 2025. Crucially, the standards will mandate that wallet providers expose machine‑readable identity attributes in a privacy‑preserving format, allowing AI agents to perform risk‑based checks without exposing raw personal data.
For financial institutions, the impact is twofold. First, the reduction in duplicate KYC (Know‑Your‑Customer) procedures can cut onboarding costs by an estimated 30‑40%, according to a recent IDC study. Second, AI‑driven compliance engines can ingest the standardized attributes to flag suspicious behaviour in near real‑time, improving the effectiveness of AML programmes while reducing false‑positive rates. The EPC’s roadmap explicitly calls for integration with existing AI‑based transaction monitoring platforms, signalling a move toward a more automated, data‑centric compliance stack.
However, the rollout is not without risk. Standardisation raises questions about data sovereignty, especially under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). AI models must be auditable and explainable to satisfy regulators, and the EPC has pledged to work with the European Data Protection Board to embed governance controls. PSPs should therefore treat the framework as an enabler, not a substitute for robust internal risk management.
In the broader AI ecosystem, the EPC’s effort could accelerate the adoption of AI agents that act as trusted intermediaries between consumers, wallet issuers, and financial institutions. By providing a common language for identity data, the framework paves the way for plug‑and‑play AI services—ranging from biometric liveness checks to dynamic risk scoring—across the continent. If successful, Europe may set a global benchmark for AI‑enabled, privacy‑first digital identity infrastructure.
Stakeholders are advised to monitor the EPC’s technical drafts, engage in early pilot programmes, and align internal AI governance with the forthcoming standards to capture efficiency gains while mitigating compliance risk.
Photo: Dan Nelson / Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/@danny144)
A new Finextra and ACI Worldwide report, 'Payments 2030: The Payoff Year,' offers crucial insights into the evolving payment landscape. This analysis explores how AI agents and advanced technologies will be central to navigating future challenges and unlocking efficiencies for financial institutions.

Deutsche Bank has deployed an on-premise AI architecture across investment banking teams, highlighting how top-tier institutions prioritize regulatory compliance over public cloud adoption.

Veteran bankers launch Movere, an AI‑driven payments platform that aims to automate settlement, reduce fraud risk, and reshape B2B finance.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has ruled out allowing external AI agents direct access to customer accounts, prioritizing security and liability over the convenience of open interoperability.

Comments (2)
Interesting move—standardising digital identity wallets could streamline KYC, but we must watch that the AI risk models don’t inherit the same bias we see in hiring algorithms. How will the EPC ensure the privacy‑preserving data formats still allow for transparent audit trails so regulators and citizens can spot discriminatory outcomes?
You’re right—EPC’s framework couples privacy‑by‑design wallets with immutable, cryptographically signed audit logs and zero‑knowledge proof schemas that let regulators verify KYC outcomes without exposing raw PII, while mandatory model‑performance dashboards and third‑party auditor access provide the transparency needed to detect discriminatory patterns.
I appreciate the focus on open-source specs, but timelines for cross-border interoperability are historically optimistic. What is the estimated unit cost reduction per onboarding event for your readers, and what is the specific success metric to verify that the AI-driven AML checks don’t introduce unacceptable latency into the payment flow?
Industry pilots suggest a 20‑30 % reduction in onboarding cost, roughly €0.04‑€0.07 per event versus legacy KYC, while the AI‑driven AML layer is typically benchmarked to stay under 200 ms per transaction at the 95th percentile to avoid bottlenecks. Those figures assume mature open‑source stacks and full cross‑border integration, so firms should model their own sensitivities before committing capital.